Who really gains the virtual currency collapse?
Hello. I am noname.
The virtual currency has collapsed in the last few days, and it makes me awfully amused.
What I always think at such times,
“Never give up when you are in a rush or crash”
This can be asserted only because it has been scantily failing with FX and stock in the past.
Certainly, keeping hold is one way, and it may be a way to sell it and see the situation once.
Some people will also buy orders.
However, whatever choice you choose, you must not forget
“1. What was the cause?”
“2. Is the cause really true?”
“3. Who will earn with this crash (boom)?”
If we do not go through firmly here, we will fail forever in the market.
1. The collapse of the virtual currency this time, what was the cause?
It is said that the cause of the collapse of the virtual currency in the last few days,
It is said that the news that flowed has been triggered.
Also, in a recent trend, is it the news on ‘trading in virtual currencies in Korea and Indonesia?’
In other words, it is generally analyzed that the “atmosphere” that “the movement to regulate virtual currency trading has spread around the world” is the state that the market frenzes fear and the market is crashing.
I think that there are many other causes of the crash, but for the time being, this time I would like to think on the premise that “due to anxiety that virtual currency trading is prohibited”.
2. Then, can trade in virtual currency truly be regulated at international level?
I’d like to think over this area carefully, but the biggest focus of this plunge play is “anxiety” that crackdown on virtual currencies may spread globally.
So the market is moving only with “anxiety” that “regulation related to virtual currency transactions will come” “.
Of course, as the market moves according to the psychology of the investor, it is not a strange story that the price goes down as there is anxiety.
However, it is a little panic state that selling is reading selling though regulation is not completely decided.
Also, assuming that a bill to control the virtual currency is established, the question “1. Do you really control the virtual currency?” Remains.
In addition, “2. By regulating the virtual currency, who gets benefits and who will lose?” Also raises the question.
2-1. How can we regulate the virtual currency?
First of all, it can be thought of as a scenario where the virtual currency can be perfectly restricted,
1. Mining restrictions
2. Exchange regulations
3. Regulation of wallet possession
If you can completely regulate these three, you probably think that the virtual currency can be eradicated.
As for mining already, “News that China business withdraws” has flowed. (This is not “regulation” but “withdrawal” …)
Regarding the regulation of exchanges, it is considered that certain regulations are possible due to countermeasures such as making business licensing system like in Japan.
And if the regulation of possession of wallet is successful, it will be able to completely eliminate the virtual currency because it will be impossible to hold any virtual currency as well as exchanges.
However, if you think carefully, it is impossible to regulate the virtual currency completely unless the world is united and tackled with all regulations 1 to 3.
Of course, there are remarks that countries all over the world unite and “try to regulate virtual currency” inside.
As in the article above, if countries around the world successfully control the virtual currency, I think it is possible to eradicate the virtual currency.
However, it is clear that the ban on innocence such as drugs, weapons / ammunition, nuclear weapons, etc. are not even controlled prohibit the actual prohibition, the direction of which the opinions of the five permanent directors exactly match is in the rare case world situation Can you easily control the virtual currency with all 193 countries?
In the first place, if even one country accepting the virtual currency appears, a lot of mining companies and virtual currency money will come in there.
In other words, if any country accepting virtual currency appears, regulation of mining and regulation of exchanges can be said to be “virtually impossible”.
In addition, the regulation of possession of wallet is a story with considerable murmuring.
While a lot of illegal files such as torrents and this av etc. are being uploaded to the world, how can we punish only the possession of Wallet at pinpoint?
In the first place, even with crackdown on simple possession of drugs, I think that regulation of possession of wallet is incomprehensible because it is in the world.
In other words, when thinking in reality, the regulation of the virtual currency is a state that “virtually impossible” state.
3. Should it be possible to regulate virtual currency, who gets earned and who loses it?
However, since there is nothing to say reliable in the world, if by any chance succeed in regulating the virtual currency at the global level, who gets the benefit and who loses it?
I would like to think a bit about this neighborhood.
First of all, I’m raising the prohibition of virtual currency trading loudly when quoting from the introduction site earlier,
· Vice President Silver Vice President
· Board member
· Central bank in Indonesia
In other words, you can see that the bank speaks saying “Please prohibit virtual currency”.
This neighborhood is easy to understand.
It is a survival crisis of banks that have earned money through international remittance and deposit fees, so it seems likely that future lobbying seeking regulation of virtual currencies will strengthen.
Also, an excellent credit card as overseas payment may not be feeling very good as the virtual currency spreads.
※ This neighborhood, UFJ Bank etc are interesting.
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ and Mizuho Bank issue their own virtual currency while the world’s banks seek the regulation of the virtual currency.
I think the judgment of UFJ Bank is interesting.
If the deposit or remittance function is deprived by the virtual currency, banks themselves need to play the role of the exchange in virtual currency more than once.
It seems that Japan always likes Galapagos direction (laugh)
Aside from Japan, it can be said that it is the bank that regulates the virtual currency and obtains it mainly.
The difficult thing is the existence of the country.
Since the leaders of each country are not stupid, I think that each country is the answer to the virtual currency naturally.
However, Japan is a good example, and as a country it is a big opportunity to raise tax revenue.
Also, I personally think that Japan, who really wants to aim for financial oppression, is secretly expecting Japan’s inflation contribution by the virtual currency.
It seems that he wants to continue development research on block chain technology.
Besides, it is also a big chance of foreign currency mass inflows via the virtual currency exchange in China.
So I am aware that there are risks of money laundering and tax evasion through virtual currency, but I think that it is not the real intention of each country that expectations for the virtual currency industry can not be abandoned.
※ In addition, it is already in the state that the main person of the country is a holder and it is not wanting to cut even if you want to cut it …
Truly dangerous is when the block chain system collapses
This time I was writing a column-like article earlier due to the incompatibility of creating blogs.
※ Or, just after launching a blog this price …
As I mentioned at the beginning,
“Never give up when you are in a rush or crash”
This is truly ironed.
You should sell it as soon as the price settles down and you only have to buy it.
Some people are trying to make short sells and bargain-hunting in the crash market, but you can not wait for the virtual currency to mature as soon as you do not aim for 100 million people. I think so.
In the first place, someone (mainly banks) of this slashing drama fueled a lot of uneasiness, confused the market, capitalists piggybacked on the turmoil charged cash points.
I think that it will be a flow that repeats itself whenever it is time.
We think that the ordinary person is an ordinary man, and it would be good if we only need to buy the currency I would like to support with surplus funds.
However, caution is necessary when the block chain system collapses.
The fact that the virtual currency can guarantee the value to the last is because “the transaction history is not tampered with the block chain”.
Also, attention is necessary when “everyone ceases to think of money”.
Many of the holders selling up now are not investing in the block chain system but people who speculated in the virtual currency,
Even if you are running away with strategic selling, how much market participants will come back after the crash has stopped?
I think that it will go up with nature and price if the value on block chain is re-recognized, but how about this neighborhood?
In any case, let’s act calmly.